[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
times, dates, images, and S-W
- To: lojban-list@snark.thyrsus.com
- Subject: times, dates, images, and S-W
- From: Major <cbmvax!uunet!pta.oz.au!major>
- Date: Thu, 30 Aug 90 11:34:40 +0800
- In-Reply-To: "Arthur W. Protin Jr." (GC-ACCURATE)'s message of Mon, 6 Aug 90 16:59:59 EDT <9008061659.aa08340@COR4.PICA.ARMY.MIL>
- Organization: Library of Scientific Knowledge (Inc)
- Resent-Date: Fri, 12 Jul 91 14:37:56 EDT
- Resent-From: cbmvax!uunet!PICA.ARMY.MIL!protin
- Resent-Message-Id: <9107121843.AA06025@relay1.UU.NET> 31 Aug 90 0:39 EDT(from major@pyrmania.oz.au for lojban-list@snark.thyrsus.com)
- Resent-To: John Cowan <cowan@snark.thyrsus.com>
- Sender: cbmvax!uunet!pta.oz.au!major
"Arthur W. Protin Jr." (GC-ACCURATE) <protin%PICA.ARMY.MIL@munnari.oz> writes:
> [regarding] conventions for time and date representations [as
> discussed by] John Hodges & Bob
> [...]
> [methods] I currently use for representing dates:
> [...]
> (2) as year followed by two digit number of month followed by
> two digit day of the month as in
> 900806 or 19900806
^^^^^^
WARNING: This method will break badly in just 10 years. Is 010202
01 February 2002, 01 February 1902, 02 February 2001 or 02 Febraury 1901?
YOU have a convention of yymmdd, but there is nothing which makes
that obviously better than ddmmyy. Which you are using is only obvious
in those years when yy>31.
Happy hacking! | For every action, there is an equal and
| opposite government program.
Major |
major@pta.oz.au |
- Prev by Date:
times, dates, images, and S-W
- Next by Date:
Re: times, dates, images, and S-W
- Prev by thread:
times, dates, images, and S-W
- Next by thread:
Re: times, dates, images, and S-W
- Index(es):