[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
times, dates, images, and S-W
- To: dave@prc.unisys.com
- Subject: times, dates, images, and S-W
- From: Major <cbmvax!uunet!pta.oz.au!major>
- Date: Mon, 3 Sep 90 10:35:42 +0800
- Cc: lojban-list@snark.thyrsus.com
- In-Reply-To: dave@PRC.Unisys.COM's message of Fri, 31 Aug 90 11:26:15 -0400 <9008311526.AA00582@gem>
- Organization: Library of Scientific Knowledge (Inc)
- Resent-Date: Fri, 12 Jul 91 14:39:55 EDT
- Resent-From: cbmvax!uunet!PICA.ARMY.MIL!protin
- Resent-Message-Id: <9107121843.AA06184@relay1.UU.NET> 3 Sep 90 6:51 EDT(from major@pyrmania.oz.au)
- Resent-To: John Cowan <cowan@snark.thyrsus.com>
- Sender: cbmvax!uunet!pta.oz.au!major
dave@PRC.Unisys.COM writes:
> A big advantage is that numerical sorts work just fine.
>
> [defending his suggestion for date layout]
> Another advantage is that it doesn't favor either American-style dates
> (mm/dd/yy) or British-style dates (dd/mm/yy)
No, it favors Japanese-style dates yymmdd or yy.mm.dd
> it's more logical than either, and it can be equally easily explained
> to members of both groups.
The American method mirrors the way we pronounce the date
010290 January second 1990
The British method is ascending order of significance and the Japanese
descending order of significance.
The British or Japanese seem more 'logical' (I hate using that word in this
group) to me but ease of computer sorting is not enough of a tie-breaker
for me to say that the Japanese way is a clear winner.
Happy hacking! | For every action, there is an equal and
| opposite government program.
Major |
major@pta.oz.au |