[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Observative example, grammar question
- To: lojban-list
- Subject: Re: Observative example, grammar question
- From: cowan (John Cowan)
- Date: Wed, 22 May 91 12:53:07 EDT
- In-Reply-To: <9105211537.AA21406@luna.math.ucla.edu>; from "math.ucla.edu!jimc" at May 21, 91 8:37 am
la djim. kartr. cusku di'e:
> At the L.A. group meeting we discussed "observatives", Initially we had
> trouble to analyse the meaning of the bare kunbri "nanmu"; we concluded
> that it meant "manliness is happening here", but the distinction between
> that and "a man", while obviously real, is hard to explain. But we came
> up with a better example:
>
> carvi It's raining
> lo carvi Look, raindrops
Bare "nanmu" does not mean "manliness is happening here", which would be
a different observative: "ka nanmu". "nanmu" is analyzed as follows:
nanmu
zo'e nanmu
something-unspecified is-a-man
A man!
Similarly, "carvi" means "something-unspecified is raining". Both of these
observatives state claims. "lo carvi" and "lo nanmu" state no claim: they
simply refer to something, without telling you anything about the referent.
> Now a grammar question: Translate "The cat on the mat eats the rat" using
> a modal phrase.
>
> le mlatu be vi le matci cu citka le ratcu
>
> Is "be" used correctly here to link "vi le matci" to the sumti rather than
> the selbri?
Yes, this is correct.
> Assuming it is (and continuing a previous thread), how does
> this differ from
>
> le bajra be ve lo'e dargu cu citka le cinki
> The roadrunner (runner via roads) eats the insect (ve = place tag 4)
This is ungrammatical: you are using a conversion where you should be using
a place marker. You need "le bajra be fo lo'e dargu".
> (Please don't flame the literal translation; I needed an exact parallel.)
> The official linker is "vo be" (digit 4), but would my usage actually be
> rejected by the grammar and would it be incomprehensible to subsequent
> steps?
That's Old Loglan; we no longer have numeric-marked linkers. In Lojban,
"BE term [BEI term] ... /BEhO/" is pure glue; it simply attaches trailing
terms to a selbri, so that you can get the semantics of a full bridi where
the grammar allows only a selbri, notably in descriptions. The bridi
underlying the description in your sample sentence is:
bajra fo lo'e dargu
something runs via the-typical road
and to make this a description, we insert the glue around the trailing
sumti, including its place marker.
--
cowan@snark.thyrsus.com ...!uunet!cbmvax!snark!cowan
e'osai ko sarji la lojban