[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
lojban negation: summary
- To: cbmvax!snark.thyrsus.com!lojbab
- Subject: lojban negation: summary
- From: cbmvax!uunet!gnu.ai.mit.edu!grackle!bob
- Date: Sun, 26 May 91 12:49:39 EDT
- Cc: ai-lab!lojban-list@snark.thyrsus.com
- Reply-To: cbmvax!uunet!gnu.ai.mit.edu!grackle!bob
- Sender: cbmvax!uunet!gnu.ai.mit.edu!grackle!bob
Lojbab's essay on lojban negation is both long and dense. Here is an
attempt to summarize the five major types types of negation that he
describes. I think I have got them right, but am not sure;
corrections please!
The five types of negation are
1. Assert "it is false that ..." bridi negation
2. Assert "there are no ..." zero quantification of sumti
3. Assert "...other-than..." scalar negation
4. Assert "...opposite-than..." opposite scalar negation
5. Assert "presuppositions are false that ..." metalinguistic negation
Here are short descriptions of each:
1. Falsehood assertion (for bridi) La lojbab calls this: bridi negation
Falsehood assertions state that the sentence is false. There are
two variations, both meaning exactly the same.
1a. external bridi negation
A prenex-using falsehood assertion (an external bridi negation)
states that the sentence following the header is false. The
header is called a "prenex" and is the phrase: "naku zo'u",
meaning, "it is false that".
naku zo'u lo mlatu cu vofli
it is false that at-least-one-that-really-is-a cat flies
1b. internal bridi negation
An internal bridi negation denies the truth of a sentence
*exactly* as does an external bridi negation. The only difference
is that internal bridi negation does not use a prenex, but places
"na" before the selbri.
It is strongly recommended that novice Logban speakers never use
internal bridi negation form, since it is easily confused with an
English form of apparently similar but actually different meaning.
lo mlatu na vofli
it is false that at-least-one-that-really-is-a cat flies
Note that the English translation of the internal bridi negation
is exactly the same as the translation of the similar sentence
with external bridi negation.
2. Absence assertion (for sumti)
La lojbab calls this: sumti negation by zero quantification
Absence assertion states that there are zero or no instances of
the sumti.
le no mlatu ca sipna
Zero of that-described-as-(by- me,-presumably) cat now sleep
i.e., none in the set of those described by me as cats now sleep.
Note that "lo no mlatu cu sipna" states that "zero of those that
actually are cats sleep"; while a rambunctious cat may lead one to
believe this, this statement is claiming that no cat anywhere in
the world ever sleeps, which is false. However, if I refering to
a single entity that I describe as a cat, and it is not sleeping,
then the " le no mlatu ca sipna" sentence is true.
3. Other-than assertion
3a. scalar selbri negation
Other-than selbri assertion states that the sentence is true of a
different selbri.
le mlatu cu na'e xunre
that-described-as-a cat is other-than red
Sometimes, "na'e" is translated as "non-" as "non-red".
Listeners are expected to use their cultural knowledge to determine
what might be the category to which a different selbri could belong.
For example, when referring to an entity other-than-red, the
other-than-red entity could be "black"; a listener would not expect
that the other-than-red entity be "rock".
If a listener is unable to determine the expected group of
other-than entities, the speaker may specify the group, for example:
le mlatu cu na'e xunre ci'u lo ka skari
that-described-as-a cat is other-than red on-a-scale-of colorness
3b. scalar sumti negation with na'ebo
Other-than sumti assertion states that the sentence is true of a
different sumti.
na'ebo le mlatu cu xunre
something-other-than that-described-as-a cat is red
In this form of negation, some grouper must be used with "na'e",
lest the listener become confused as to what "na'e" is modifying.
Novices are urged to use "bo", the short scope joiner, which limits
the range of "na'e" to the following sumti.
4. Polar opposite assertion with "nai"
also known as: opposite or contrary scalar negation
Polar opposite assertion states that the culturally-defined
opposite is true; or if no opposite is evident, that something
other than the assertion is the case.
"nai" is a suffix modifying the immediately preceding word; in
writing, "nai" is often joined to the preceding word.
ienai
emotional-state-is-opposite-that-of-agreement-concord-or-harmony
i.e., disagreement-disharmony
u'enai
emotional-state-is-opposite-that-of-wonder-or-amazement
i.e., boredom
All attitudinals and discursives have lojban-creator defined
opposites; it will be interesting to see whether fluent lojban
speakers understand the opposites in the same way or whether
they redefine the semantic space of each word.
le mlatu ca nai sipna
that-described-as cat opposite-than now sleep
Note that "opposite-than now" could be either past or future, so in
this case, you cannot deduce a single polar opposite meaning.
5. Metalinguistic negation
Metalinguistic negation states that something is wrong with the
presuppositions of the sentence.
Given the true or false question:
xu lo mlatu
Is-it-the-case-that at-least-one-that-really-is-a cat
ca sisti lo nu vofli
stops the-event/process-of flying
An answer is:
na'i
Something-is-wrong-with-the-statement-that
lo mlatu ca sisti lo nu vofli
a cat stops flying
6. Natural language negation with "naku"
It is possible to express the forms of natural language negation in
lojban by using "naku", but the process is confusing. Novices are
urged to avoid any such attempts.
7. Answering yes and no.
You can say the equivalent of "yes" in Lojban by saying "ja'a go'i".
You can say the equivalent of "no" in Lojban by saying "na go'i".
"ja'a" is the bridi affirmer; "na" is the bridi negator
The cmavo "go'i" means "the preceding bridi". Simply stating
"go'i" is a way of repeating the preceding sentence.
Often you can express a meaning of `yes' by simply repeating a
preceding sentence, but beware! A plain "go'i' quotes the
preceding sentence exactly as is. This may not be what you want.
If you utter a "go'i" and something else, the `something else' is
added to or substituted into the preceding sentence in the
appropriate grammatical position in place of whatever was there.
Thus, a "na go'i" will add or substitute "na" into the preceding
sentence, thus making sure the repeated sentence is negated.
A "ja'a go'i" will add "ja'a to a sentence, substituting "ja'a" for
"na" if the sentence has a "na", thereby making sure the repeated
sentence is affirmed.
You can use the phrase "na'i go'i" to metalinguistically negate
the preceding sentence.
Given the true or false question:
xu lo mlatu ca sisti lo nu vofli Has the cat stopped flying?
You can answer either
na'i lo mlatu ca sisti lo nu vofli
or
na'i go'i
================
That all.
Robert J. Chassell bob@gnu.ai.mit.edu
Rattlesnake Mountain Road (413) 298-4725 or (617) 253-8568 or
Stockbridge, MA 01262-0693 USA (617) 876-3296 (for messages)