[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Meaning of "only"
- To: John Cowan <cowan@snark.thyrsus.com>, Ken Taylor <taylor@gca.com>, List Reader <ghsvax!hal>
- Subject: Meaning of "only"
- From: "61510::GILSON" <cbmvax!uunet!pucc.princeton.edu!gilson!61510.decnet>
- Reply-To: "61510::GILSON" <cbmvax!uunet!pucc.princeton.edu!gilson!61510.decnet>
- Sender: Lojban list <cbmvax!uunet!pucc.princeton.edu!LOJBAN>
Richard Kennaway writes:
>After posting one message about "only", I read And Rosta's example of a
>quite different meaning for the word, viz.
>> Only plants reproduce asexually
>>is equivalent to:
>> All reproduction such that it is asexual is undergone by plants.
>>I haven't worked through whether this is watertight, & I haven't written
>>any sort of rule for what _only_ means, but one can see how one might
>>proceed towards formulating the rule.
I don't think this is really a different meaning. It looks a little different
because the "only" phrase is the subject, but if we look at Richard's earlier
analysis, which said:
>"Only" seems to me to be a three-place predicate masquerading as a
>two-place one. "X is only Y" means "X is Y and, perhaps contrary to
>expectation, is not Z", where Z is left unstated.
and put
X = asexually reproducing species,
Y = plants, and
Z = (presumably) animals,
I see no difference here.
Bruce