[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 'only'
- To: John Cowan <cowan@snark.thyrsus.com>, Ken Taylor <taylor@gca.com>, List Reader <ghsvax!hal>
- Subject: Re: 'only'
- From: cbmvax!uunet!pucc.princeton.edu!jimc
- In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 01 Oct 91 09:27:16 BST." <9110012317.AA09573@julia.math.ucla.edu>
- Reply-To: cbmvax!uunet!pucc.princeton.edu!jimc
- Sender: Lojban list <cbmvax!uunet!pucc.princeton.edu!LOJBAN>
Richard Kennaway <jrk@INFORMATION-SYSTEMS.EAST-ANGLIA.AC.UK> writes:
> "Only" seems to me to be a three-place predicate masquerading as a
> two-place one. "X is only Y" means "X is Y and, perhaps contrary to
> expectation, is not Z", where Z is left unstated.
It has yet another related meaning: x1 is (abstract) x2, and, perhaps
unexpectedly, it is no more than that on some scale (x3?) relevant to
x2. The polar opposite in this version is "very". Example:
You got only a B on the test? (I expected an A.)
I have only $10 (while I need more to buy...)
You are only a teacher (Speaker character is putting down
listener character by saying her social class is less
than that of her new boyfriend)
-- jimc