[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
lojban predicates
- To: John Cowan <cowan@SNARK.THYRSUS.COM>, Eric Raymond <eric@SNARK.THYRSUS.COM>, Eric Tiedemann <est@SNARK.THYRSUS.COM>
- Subject: lojban predicates
- From: cbmvax!uunet!GNU.AI.MIT.EDU!pucc.PRINCETON.EDU!bob
- Comments: Warning -- original Sender: tag was bob@GRACKLE.STOCKBRIDGE.MA.US
- Reply-To: cbmvax!uunet!gnu.ai.mit.edu!pucc.PRINCETON.EDU!bob
- Sender: Lojban list <cbmvax!uunet!CUVMA.BITNET!pucc.PRINCETON.EDU!LOJBAN>
Here is a way to think about lojban predicates in contrast to English
verbs.
In the written language of arithmetic, we write expressions such as
the following:
2 + 2
In this example, the plus-sign is the equivalent of a lojban gismu.
If I write
2 +
you know there is something missing...you yearn for another number, to
complete the expression.
The same with a lojban expression:
mi klama
I come/go
is incomplete. In lojban, you yearn for a destination, departure,
path, and means.
However, the expression "mi klama" is not so badly incomplete as the
expression "2 +". In normal arithmetic, "2 +" is not grammatical.
Here is a better comparison to "mi klama":
First, think in the context of expressions such as
2 + 3 = 5
3 + 4 = 7
Then, look at the expression
2 + 2
In this context, you see "2 + 2" and you know that it is a grammatical
expression, but also that it is incomplete. You yearn to add "= 4" to
the expression.
(But note that the complete arithmetic expression consists of two
predicates, the plus-sign and the equals-sign; the lojban expression
using "klama" is an expression with only one predicate, asserting a
relationship among five objects/states/processes/entitites in the
universe.)
Robert J. Chassell bob@gnu.ai.mit.edu
Rattlesnake Mountain Road (413) 298-4725 or (617) 253-8568 or
Stockbridge, MA 01262-0693 USA (617) 876-3296 (for messages)