[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
BAI places
- To: John Cowan <cowan@SNARK.THYRSUS.COM>, Eric Raymond <eric@SNARK.THYRSUS.COM>, Eric Tiedemann <est@SNARK.THYRSUS.COM>
- Subject: BAI places
- From: "Mark E. Shoulson" <cbmvax!uunet!CTR.COLUMBIA.EDU!pucc.PRINCETON.EDU!shoulson>
- In-Reply-To: jimc%MATH.UCLA.EDU@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu's message of Fri, 11 Oct 1991 13:46:16 -0700
- Reply-To: "Mark E. Shoulson" <cbmvax!uunet!CTR.COLUMBIA.EDU!pucc.PRINCETON.EDU!shoulson>
- Sender: Lojban list <cbmvax!uunet!CUVMA.BITNET!pucc.PRINCETON.EDU!LOJBAN>
This is, to be sure, a hairy point. I strongly believe that attaching
*all* possible BAI and FIhO phrases to all bridi is a Bad Thing. This
would amount to talking about everything in the universe whenever you say
anything. An interesting philosophy, but not the way to build a language.
You might as well have only one phrase: "fasnu" ("Something happens",
roughly). And considering that you're saying infinitely many things when
you say anything, I think someone could probably cook up a way of looking
at things such that some of these shadow phrases wind up contradicting one
another: NOT what you want for a logical language (It may not be as bad as
that; it may be impossible to get clear-cut contradiction, owing to the
broad meaning of "zo'e").
I'd prefer the viewpoint that a bridi has on it only its numbered places,
whether filled or ellipsized, but I admit that this is unsatisfying, as
some BAI phrases really do seem to belong on brivla that don't have them.
Still, in this case, I think I'd rather prefer having less rather than
more.
See, I don't like the idea of saying, "These BAI are special; they're on
all bridi. These are only there if you put them there." That sounds too
random and irregular. It's treading dangerous ground.
~mark