[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: "Reversed Japanese" as a model for a conlang syntax?
- To: John Cowan <cowan@SNARK.THYRSUS.COM>, Eric Raymond <eric@SNARK.THYRSUS.COM>, Eric Tiedemann <est@SNARK.THYRSUS.COM>
- Subject: Re: "Reversed Japanese" as a model for a conlang syntax?
- From: cbmvax!uunet!MATH.UCLA.EDU!pucc.PRINCETON.EDU!jimc
- In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 25 Oct 91 14:38:25 EDT." <9110251841.AA23647@julia.math.ucla.edu>
- Reply-To: cbmvax!uunet!MATH.UCLA.EDU!pucc.PRINCETON.EDU!jimc
- Sender: Lojban list <cbmvax!uunet!CUVMA.BITNET!pucc.PRINCETON.EDU!LOJBAN>
> Date: Fri, 25 Oct 1991 14:38:25 EDT
> From: "Mark E. Shoulson" <shoulson@CTR.COLUMBIA.EDU>
> Subject: "Reversed Japanese" as a model for a conlang syntax?
>...
> As to your different ways of expressing "the house" when it existed only
> after the action was finished vs. only before vs. not necessarily ever etc.
> I seem to think that Loglan, or at least one of jimc's variants (nalgol?)
> had distinctions like that. I get this from comments on an old story jimc
> wrote in Loglan. Bob, jimc, can you enlighten us?
I don't remember the exact context, but in both Old Loglan and in
Lojban a tense on a sumti-tail (S-bridi) gives this flavor. The Lojban
possibilities are much richer -- see selma'o <ZAhO>. For example:
le mo'u zdani cu po'ayfa'u (spoja farlu)
the expired house fell to pieces (explode fall)
(from mulno; natural end of process)
ko'a zbacfa le co'a zdani (zbasu cfari)
they began building the new house (assemble initiate)
(from krasi; start of process)
le zdani be bamo'u le nu ke'a se zbasu
the house after (completion of) (its) assembly
le zdani be ba le nu ke'a mo'u se zbasu
the house after (its) complete assembly
The first two show off <ZAhO>; I hope their syntax is similar to
BAI-PU. But they don't really address your problem, which number 3
does. I hope number 3 is syntactically valid. Number 4 seems to fit
my prejudices better for how to represent this meaning.
In both cases, I'm not sure if ke'a has an officially defined
antecedent; I suppose one could use "ri" since no other sumti
intervenes. In the -gua!spi equivalents (which are subordinate
clauses), "le zdani" would be replicated here automatically.
By the way, I didn't see the original posting; I assume it was on
conlang.
-- jimc