[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
re: name formation (was: re dreaded only)
- To: John Cowan <cowan@snark.thyrsus.com>
- Subject: re: name formation (was: re dreaded only)
- From: David Cortesi <cbmvax!uunet!cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu!cortesi>
- Date: Thu, 16 Jan 1992 14:48:21 TZONE
- Comments: Warning -- original Sender: tag was cortesi@CRICKHOLLOW.INFORMIX.COM
- In-Reply-To: <9201151409.AA12832@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu>
- Reply-To: David Cortesi <cbmvax!uunet!cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu!cortesi>
- Sender: Lojban list <cbmvax!uunet!cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu!LOJBAN>
Mark explains about name formation and in closing says,
> So "la mlatu" is fine, since we don't have the
> restrictions there.
A note to writers of tutorials and the like: the impression
that all intro material leaves is that "la <cmene>" is a
name, and a key morphological point about <cmene> is that
they end in a consonant and a pause.
The latter got tied up in my mind with "la"; that is, I had the
lingering impression that "la" is on opening delimiter for which
the matching close-delimiter is <consonant><pause>. Under this
interpretation, "la mlatu" would not be fine at all.
So when explaining to the novice how to name things, try to keep
the idea of "la" == "that which I call" separate from the idea
of the formation of a nominal in Lojban phonemes.
.i ni'o ni'o -- could Mark and others please take pains to
attach signature lines to their mailings? The lojban mail
server does not retain the originator's return address. The only
"from:" line that I see is (for instance) cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu!shoulson.
Attempts to send private replies get bounced from that node.
Dave Cortesi -- cortesi@informix.com