[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Allophones of zero in Lojban
- To: John Cowan <cowan@SNARK.THYRSUS.COM>, Eric Raymond <eric@SNARK.THYRSUS.COM>, Eric Tiedemann <est@SNARK.THYRSUS.COM>
- Subject: Allophones of zero in Lojban
- From: Ivan A Derzhanski <cbmvax!uunet!COGSCI.ED.AC.UK!cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu!iad>
- Date: Sat, 1 Feb 1992 19:38:11 GMT
- In-Reply-To: nsn@AU.OZ.MU.EE.MULLIAN's message of Fri, 31 Jan 1992 22:37:57 +1100 <27186.9201311221@cogsci.ed.ac.uk
- Reply-To: Ivan A Derzhanski <cbmvax!uunet!COGSCI.ED.AC.UK!cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu!iad>
- Sender: Lojban list <cbmvax!uunet!CUVMA.BITNET!cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu!LOJBAN>
I wasn't bothered much when I read that Lojban was supposed to have a
thing called a buffer vowel, which a speaker was permitted to insert
between consonants whenever he felt like it.
I wasn't bothered much when I read that this vowel was allowed to vary
from speaker to speaker, and that English speakers were advised to use
a sound written as /I/, and to pronounce {mlatu} as /mIlatu/.
I wasn't bothered, that is, I didn't feel compelled to speak up.
Still, I have to declare, on behalf of the entire body of Slavic-
tongued people, that while we have some sympathy for those who have
trouble pronouncing word-initial /ml/ (a cluster we take for granted),
we will have to undergo some special training to learn to distinguish
/I/ from /i/. I personally can't tell them apart, all my linguistic
training nonwithstanding.
I'm generally opposed to the idea of a buffer vowel, because I think
it would make word recognition much more difficult. I would favour an
epenthetic schwa, say, {.ymlatu}, where the listener would naturally
delete the {.y-} as a semantically empty space filler.
Ivan