[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: phonemes
- To: John Cowan <cowan@SNARK.THYRSUS.COM>, Eric Raymond <eric@SNARK.THYRSUS.COM>, Eric Tiedemann <est@SNARK.THYRSUS.COM>
- Subject: Re: phonemes
- From: Logical Language Group <cbmvax!uunet!GREBYN.COM!cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu!lojbab>
- Date: Mon, 10 Feb 1992 23:57:34 -0500
- Reply-To: Logical Language Group <cbmvax!uunet!GREBYN.COM!cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu!lojbab>
- Sender: Lojban list <cbmvax!uunet!CUVMA.BITNET!cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu!LOJBAN>
Since the buffer is defined by convention to be a sound that is not found in]
LOjban's phonemic inventory, I see no reason why it cannot appear anywhere.
I don;t know why it WOULD appear somewhere else, except perhaps as another
kind of hesitation sound between words.
Remember that we define the buffer in terms of its appearing in consonant c
clusters, saying it is a non-Lojban sound. We never say anywhere that non-
Lojban sounds have any meaning in any other part of a word - it is not relevant
to Lojban phonology, of course - nor is it relevant to a speaker - we teach
people what we want them to do, not the full range of things they could
possibly do.
lojbab