[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Billions
- To: John Cowan <cowan@SNARK.THYRSUS.COM>, Eric Raymond <eric@SNARK.THYRSUS.COM>, Eric Tiedemann <est@SNARK.THYRSUS.COM>
- Subject: Billions
- From: Ivan A Derzhanski <cbmvax!uunet!COGSCI.ED.AC.UK!cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu!iad>
- Date: Wed, 12 Feb 1992 10:41:16 GMT
- In-Reply-To: Guy Steele's message of Tue, 11 Feb 1992 12:31:00 EST <13414.9202120010@cogsci.ed.ac.uk
- Reply-To: Ivan A Derzhanski <cbmvax!uunet!COGSCI.ED.AC.UK!cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu!iad>
- Sender: Lojban list <cbmvax!uunet!CUVMA.BITNET!cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu!LOJBAN>
> Date: Tue, 11 Feb 1992 12:31:00 EST
> From: Guy Steele <gls@COM.THINK>
>
> I assure you that those who are buying memory chips and disk drives
> for their computers are very interested in nanoseconds and gigabytes.
> Terabytes and teraflops have become common terms of discussion over
> the last few years as it becomes apparent that their implementation
> will soon be a reality (indeed, terabyte tape backup was available
> well over ten years ago). Laser impulses for fiber optics are best
> measured in picoseconds, if not femtoseconds, and we are already
> beginning to think about petabyte computer memories.
What you say about seconds is true. But let's leave bytes alone. The
prefixes have a different meaning when attached to them, the factor
being 1024 rather than 1000.
I'm not sure how Lojban should handle this fact.
Ivan