[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
mu'ibo
- To: John Cowan <cowan@SNARK.THYRSUS.COM>, Eric Raymond <eric@SNARK.THYRSUS.COM>, Eric Tiedemann <est@SNARK.THYRSUS.COM>
- Subject: mu'ibo
- From: "Mark E. Shoulson" <cbmvax!uunet!CTR.COLUMBIA.EDU!cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu!shoulson>
- Date: Wed, 4 Mar 1992 14:46:12 -0500
- In-Reply-To: nsn%MULLIAN.EE.MU.OZ.AU@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu's message of Wed, 4 Mar 1992 18:13:22 +1000
- Reply-To: "Mark E. Shoulson" <cbmvax!uunet!CTR.COLUMBIA.EDU!cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu!shoulson>
- Sender: Lojban list <cbmvax!uunet!CUVMA.BITNET!cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu!LOJBAN>
Hmmm. My initial reaction is that I like it as it stands. Not sure
though. But it seems to me that it's as if we're making the sentence fill
a place in the previous sentence, so {mu'i la'edi'e .i} seems a good
expansion for {.imu'ibo}. I could see {.i mu'i la'edi'u}, but I think I
prefer the first. At least, I do at this instant... :-)
~mark