[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: tense-aspect --> ZAhO?
- To: John Cowan <cowan@SNARK.THYRSUS.COM>, Eric Raymond <eric@SNARK.THYRSUS.COM>, Eric Tiedemann <est@SNARK.THYRSUS.COM>
- Subject: Re: tense-aspect --> ZAhO?
- From: CJ FINE <cbmvax!uunet!BRADFORD.AC.UK!C.J.Fine>
- Date: Wed, 18 Mar 1992 19:31:55 GMT
- In-Reply-To: <no.id>; from "Ivan A Derzhanski" at Mar 7, 92 2:55 pm
- Reply-To: CJ FINE <cbmvax!uunet!BRADFORD.AC.UK!C.J.Fine>
- Sender: Lojban list <cbmvax!uunet!CUVMA.BITNET!pucc.Princeton.EDU!LOJBAN>
Ivan asks:
>
>
> Re things like {le mo'u zdani}...
>
>
> It doesn't say that ZAhO can be used independently as a tag without
> being preceded (and eventually followed) by an <interval-property>.
> What is going on? Is the BNF grammar just incomplete in this regard,
> or has this usage become legal after 24.2.1991?
>
My copy of the grammar (BNF.28) has the <interval-property> optional.
Kolin