Re: TECH: se, te, & lujvo

[And Rostabably <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>]

> "se" of course doesn't necessarily mean that you ARE doing such a diddling,
> though a lujvo "sel-" might allow it in a limited sense.  An x1 equivalent
> would have no meaning OTHER than that you were diddling, because CVCjerna
> would NEVER mean the same as jerna, since you would use the shorter word
> if you could.

In _seljerna_, which can be broken down into se+l+jerna, the l indicates
diddling. Why use it, except to diddle?

Perhaps, then, _(y)ljerna_ yields a diddled lujvoid with the same x1
as jerna.

----
And.