Re: TECH: query re. selcmavo NU

[Logical Language Group <lojbab@GREBYN.COM>]

mi ne pu do
uses a relative phrase, rather than a relative clause, hence has no capability
for a resumptive pronoun.  the equivalent relative clause requires converting
pu to its corresponding selbri, whihc then requires dragging abstractions
into it since the places of purci are events, and the event beig related
is not mi and do, but what we are doing.  Thus the above would be
reexpressed as
mi noi [tu'a {ke'a=mi}] purci tu'a do (cu klama le zarci)

lojbab