Re: afterthought logical connection

[Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>]

> Jorge complains:
> +++++>
> > > (I'm not
> > > sure what kanxyjvavlina means, why not just the te vlina?)
> Or was it meant to be kanxyjavyvlina?
> >++++

Colin clarifies:

> Yes, it was meant to be that. I was generalising the discussion beyond
> nunkanxe, and we haven't got an agreed term for 'logical connective'
> or its terbri. (I tried lojyjonma'o once, but I don't think it's very
> perspicuous). So I coined one on the spot.

Why not? Maybe {logji jonma'o}, so that {jonma'o} is the general term
for connective. {te jonma'o} and {ve jonma'o} would be the connectees.

(jonma'o reminds me of your Prime Minister's name, maybe it can serve
as a mnemonic.)

Jorge