[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: context in Lojban
- Subject: Re: context in Lojban
- From: "Robert J. Chassell" <bob@GNU.AI.MIT.EDU>
- In-Reply-To: <9411042345.AA15879@albert.gnu.ai.mit.edu> (jorge@phyast.pitt.edu)
So as not to confuse anyone with jargon like `+specific' and
`-specific', remember, if the context is that there are a real and a
non-real box in front of us, and our contextual range is constrained
to those boxes, then
.i mi nitcu lo tanxe
is *specific* as to which box, and
.i mi nitcu le tanxe
is *not* specific as to which box. This is basic to Lojban.
In this case, a reasonable English translation by either speaker or
listener for
.i mi nitcu lo tanxe
is
I need the box.
whereas a reasonable English translation *by the listener* for
.i mi nitcu le tanxe
is
I need a box.
(Of course the *speaker* could use *the* in both translations, since
the speaker has knowledge not available to the listener until the
listener is told, but Lojban is *not* a speaker-based language, and
never has been; this is yet another non-English side-effect of being
a dialog-based language.)
{le} is specific *in the mind of* the speaker. It is not necessarily
specific to the listener, until the speaker explains more to the
speaker. Hence, using English language inspired jargon such as
`+specific' is easily misleading. {le} is *not necessaily* +specific
until *both* speaker and listener have whatever is designated in mind
jointly.
ucleaar@ucl.ac.uk asked:
The question is whether LO can be specific: Is "lo gerku cu xunre"
*necessarily* true if there exists at least one red dog?
The answer is no, not if the context is the room I am in right now.
The answer is yes, if the context is the whole universe and true dogs
include those that look reddish to me when looking through
rosy-colored glasses.
Put another way, {le broda} in itself conveys less information to a
listener than {lo broda}, which in turn conveys less information than
{lo'i broda}.
In English, there is also a sequence, but the contents of information
are different: <a whatever> in itself conveys less information to
either listener or speaker than <the whatever>, which in turn conveys
less information than <the set of whatever>.
Robert J. Chassell bob@gnu.ai.mit.edu
25 Rattlesnake Mountain Road bob@grackle.stockbridge.ma.us
Stockbridge, MA 01262-0693 USA (413) 298-4725
Robert J. Chassell bob@gnu.ai.mit.edu
25 Rattlesnake Mountain Road bob@grackle.stockbridge.ma.us
Stockbridge, MA 01262-0693 USA (413) 298-4725