[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lo
- Subject: Re: lo
- From: Logical Language Group <lojbab>
- Date: Tue, 8 Nov 1994 00:28:11 -0500
- Cc: lojbab@access.digex.net
It sounds like you are then disagreeing with me that somewhere alonmg the
way we changed "su'o broda" from su'oda poi broda to su'o lo broda (NOT
lo su'o broda, which is what you put in theis message. We started with
the su'o da version, but I thought we (you and I) came to feel that
pragmatically (as in su'o [unicorn]) we didn't mean to claim existence.
(Only to you and me/Cowan)
lojbab