[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Some thoughts on Lojban gadri
This is my current understanding of how the Lojban gadri of selmaho
LE work. Probably it is different from the official position so, like
all I say, to be taken with lots of salt.
lo broda At least one of all things that broda.
It doesn't say which one(s), but the question
is pertinent and has an answer in principle
(which doesn't mean that the speaker has to know it).
le broda Each of the thing(s) that the speaker has in mind
that broda. It does say which one(s), even if the
listener can't tell (in which case, the comunication
hasn't been all that effective).
lo'e broda It doesn't say which one(s), and the question
is not pertinent. (The answer would be "anyone",
but since "any" is such a nasty word, let's just
say that "which one?" can't even in principle
be answered with "that one".)
le'e broda Like {lo'e broda}, but restricted to the
kind of broda the speaker has in mind (which
may include not-really broda as well).
loi broda Like {lo broda}, but instead of taken idividually
a group of broda is taken as a single entity.
lei broda Like {le broda}, but instead of each separately,
all of them as a single entity.
{lo'e broda} and {le'e broda} would correspond to {xe'e lo broda}
and {xe'e le broda} if {xe'e} was adopted. Currently there are no
direct equivalents to what would be {xe'e loi broda} and {xe'e lei
broda}.
lo'i broda Same as {lu'i ro lo broda}.
le'i broda Same as {lu'i ro le broda}.
I think these are not really necessary, since they are only useful in
very restricted mathematical contexts, and the long form is much more
explicit. One of these days I'll publish my cmavo blacklist, with all
the cmavo that I think are unnecessarily cluttering up cmavo space
(quite a number of them) :)
Jorge