Re: zi'o (was: jorne)

[ucleaar <ucleaar@ucl.ac.uk>]

> We already have great facilities for *adding* places, by using BAI cmavo or
> by making lujvo (especially standard ones like XXX-gau).  I'd rather start
> with minimal bridi and build them than delete places anyway.  Since the
> current gismu have for the most part been defined fairly minimally, I rarely
> come across the need for "zi'o".  I think the use of "zi'o" signals that a
> gismu has been defined with too many places to begin with.

True. But on the whole we're stuck with the place structures we have.
LLG has good reasons for resisting change, since lots of people don't
like it.

---
And