Re: replies re. ka & mamta be ma

[Mark A Biggar <mab@wdl.loral.com>]

>From: ucleaar <ucleaar@ucl.ac.uk>
>I'm suggesting that if there isn't a single primitive word for 1,
>and if lg (iconically) models cognition, then such a lg implies
>that 1 is not a basic concept. Furthermore, the sense of {le namcu
>pe le solri} is not 1; it just happens to refer to 1. But I concede
>that the sense of {namcu zei solri} could be 1.

Not if your talking to an alien by radio in binary star solar system :-)

--
Mark Biggar
mab@wdl.loral.com