[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Existence and occurrence of events (was: ago24 & replies)
- Subject: Re: Existence and occurrence of events (was: ago24 & replies)
- From: ucleaar <ucleaar@ucl.ac.uk>
Jorge:
> > > If the event I try for occurs, then I've succeeded. If some other related
> > > event occurs, but not the one I've tried for, then I've failed.
> > You're right if you translate it as {mi troci lo nu mi muvgau lo rokci}.
> > If you translate it as {mi troci lo nu lo rokci cu muvdu} then you're
> > wrong.
> Why? What do you mean by {mi troci lo nu lo rokci cu muvdu}?
I try to bring about an event of the rock moving. I try to get
the rock to move.
> Where does it say that I have to be the agent of the movement?
Nowhere.
> Does {troci} automatically have a {gasnu} implied, so that {mi
> troci lo nu <agentless event>} is really an elided form of {mi
> troci lo nu mi gasnu lo nu <said event>}?
No.
----
And