Re: self-descriptions?

[ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>]

> mi'e goran. .i mi caki nanca lirepapisu'o .i le kerfa .e le kanla vu'o
> po'e mi manbu'e

What does {vuo} mean there? I'd have expected {zie}. Or maybe
{kanlvuo}, ocularly-ukrainian?

> .i mi mitre lipazeji'imu gi'e ki'ogra lixaji'imu

Enjoy that kerfa and lixajiimu while you can. It doesn't last.

> lo banske .i mi pu tadni ca'o lo nanca remei lo cmacyske .iku'i mi
> steba gi'esemu'ibo sisti ca lenu mi co'a jimpe ledu'u mi selzdi lenu
> cilre le vrici bangu noi so'ecu'o tcefange gi'ebazibo co'a tadni lo
> banske

"the sundry languages that are most probably very strange and soon study
glottology"? Does that {gie (ba zi bo)} necessarily terminate the noi
clause?

> .i ku'i le mi dansu kansa co'a kansa na'ebo mi

Shd it be {le mi dansu kansa cu coa kansa}?

> .i mi nunxeldraco kelci

I'd have thought {nu xe draci} and {nu draci} are synonymous and that
therefore {nundraci} is preferable. The only difference is that I'd
expect x2 and x6 of {nundraci} and {nunxeldraci} to be swapped.

> .i mi kelci lo selcpa karda po'u la djixad.

Cards called Djixad? I thought that was what lei muslo wage against
the forces of light. Is that what you name your cards?

coo, mie noi friko ninmu tordu marksista kuo and