Re: vuo

la .and. cusku di'e

> On the subject of {vuo}, is there a way to get:
> 
>   by e [dy e gy vou ne zy]
> 
> ? Will it work if one resorts to
> 
>   by e ke dy e gy vou ne zy kee
> 
> ? And if that will work, must one resort to it?

Yes, no, no.  The brackets for sumti connection are not ke/ke'e, but
LAhE/lu'u.  In the beginning, there was only lu'i/lu'u, and they were
pure brackets and without semantic content.  Then they became
transmogrified into set/mass/individual converters, as a result of my
being misled by the incautious word "set" in the definition of lu'i.
Then LUhI and LAhE got their grammar merged under the name of LAhE.
So to say what you want you need

	by .e lu'a dy .e gy. lu'u ne zy.

assuming, that is, that your variables really do refer to individuals
and not masses or sets, to avoid unwanted conversions.

-- 
John Cowan					cowan@ccil.org
		e'osai ko sarji la lojban.