[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 2Re: CPE: la DAOdeiJIN
- To: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu (Lojban List)
- Subject: Re: 2Re: CPE: la DAOdeiJIN
- Date: Tue, 12 Dec 1995 12:39:58 -0500 (EST)
- In-Reply-To: <199512121603.LAA05573@locke.ccil.org> from "Ivan A Derzhanski" at Dec 12, 95 09:23:34 am
la .iVAN. cusku di'e
> (Add any consonant or consonant cluster to the end to make it a cmene
> -- preferably something that doesn't occur in syllable-final position
> in Chinese, so that it will be immediately identified as a cmenifier.
> That means anything other than {-n} and {-ng}.
"-r" is a bad idea too.
> I suppose {-s} is OK;
> I wonder, though, if the final could be chosen depending on the tone,
> so that it won't be lost in the lojbanisation.)
The hypothetical derivation of tones from lost finals in Old Chinese
would suggest "-x" for Mandarin third tone and "-s" for Mandarin fourth
tone (Middle Chinese tones 3 and 5 respectively), but I don't know what
to suggest for 1st and 2nd tone.
--
John Cowan cowan@ccil.org
e'osai ko sarji la lojban.