[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Disjunctive compounds (was: left factoring)
- To: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu (Lojban List)
- Subject: Disjunctive compounds (was: left factoring)
- Date: Sun, 17 Dec 1995 21:05:49 -0500 (EST)
- In-Reply-To: <199512172144.QAA19508@locke.ccil.org> from "Jorge Llambias" at Dec 17, 95 04:26:26 pm
la xorxes. cusku di'e
> {lei brife ja canre} logically seems to work, too, but I don't find it
> very appealing. Maybe it's just that we are not used to such things
> in natlangs.
Depends on which natlangs. Ivan says in his paper on noun compounds:
# There don't seem to be many languages which have disjunctive noun-noun
# compounds, in which the set of instances of the complex concept is the
# union of the sets of instances of the components, as in
# Sanskrit jayaparajaya `victory or defeat'
# (Traditionally analysed as a rather unfrequent variety of dvandva compounding)
#
# but it is quite common for the compound to refer to a superset of this union:
#
# Mongolian xorxoj soxo `insect' (`worm beetle'),
# soxo xorxoj ` ditto' (`beetle worm');
# Kazakh ayaq-tabaq `crockery' (`cup-plate');
# Qabardian dqaz `housefowl' (`hen-goose').
--
John Cowan cowan@ccil.org
e'osai ko sarji la lojban.