[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: RV: na'e entails na?




>JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS wrote:
>
>> Could you give a sentence with your definition of na'e as
>> a selbri modifier that says something useful?
>
>No.  I retract my arguments, and move to the Jorge/lojbab
>camp.

I ahven't been keeping up.  I thought Jorge disagreed with me, or was that
only about to'e and not about na'e? 

lojbab