Re: RV: na'e entails na?

[Don Wiggins <dwiggins@BFSEC.BT.CO.UK>]

> (2) If na`e doesn't entail na: How to say something equivlant to
>     na`e + na?

This is dead easy:

    .i .abu by. cy. na broda .ije na'ego'i

and go'i != broda because broda is false.

> (1) If na`e entails na: How to say something equivlant to na`e
>    but not entailing na?

I see what you mean, it is extremely difficult to formulate something
eliminating the extra condition.  However, how often would one want to say
such a thing (pragmatics as you say)?

ni'oco'omi'e dn.