Re: Summary so far on DJUNO

["Jorge J. Llambías" <jorge@INTERMEDIA.COM.AR>]

>>And doesn't {fatci} potentially have such a place?
>>
>>If yes, why is {fatci} totally useless but not the others? If no, why not?
>
>Yes.  But fatci, having only 1 place in its formal place structure, has no
>significant semantics OTHER than its absoluteness.  Most of the gismu are
>multiplace and have semantics defined largely in terms of the interaction
>between the places.  the 1 placers tedn to be the least useful of the gismu
>- the most semantically poor.

But {blanu}, {remna} and {sfofa} are all one-placers. Are they as totally
useless as {fatci}, then?

co'o mi'e xorxes