[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: more epistemic perversity (was Re: .i .uepei mi jai sel



Lojbab:
> (I am not sure that
>all opinions se jinvi are justified either, BTW).

Shouldn't there be a {ve jinvi} for every {se jinvi}?

i li'a lo se jinvi be fo noda na se jinvi

co'o mi'e xorxes