Re: Summary so far on DJUNO

[Goran Topic <amadan@USA.NET>]

> >It is
> >only if we consider "knowedge" to be different - an absolute that is
> >independent of minds,
>
> Only in the same sense that truths are independent of minds.

Umm, I don't think knowledge is independent of minds. It's just that for
someone to utter the word 'know', *he* has to consider its object to be
true. Otherwise it is his belief, or conviction, but I wouldn't call it
knowledge. I can say "What I knew then was false and totally bogus. Now
I know better.", but the sentence "What I know is false" sounds like a
zen koan or a senseless mutter of a lunatic, or maybe a discordian's
paradox; I can't accept that as a valid, meaningful sentence.

(ni'ope'i na go'i .i fau lenu bacru zo djuno kei le ba'e bacru cu birti
lese djuno gi'onai cuxna srera gi'ebo jai sarcu fai lenu bastygau zo
birti .a zo kricu .a zo jinvi .i mi ka'e cusku lu le pu djuno be mi cu
jitfa li'u .enai lu le ca djuno be mi cu jitfa lu .i ri na selsmu)

co'o mi'e. goran.