[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
clefting & raising
- To: John Cowan <cowan@SNARK.THYRSUS.COM>, Eric Raymond <eric@SNARK.THYRSUS.COM>, Eric Tiedemann <est@SNARK.THYRSUS.COM>
- Subject: clefting & raising
- From: And Rosta <cbmvax!uunet!UCL.AC.UK!ucleaar>
- Date: Tue, 14 Jul 1992 18:24:56 +0100
- Reply-To: And Rosta <cbmvax!uunet!UCL.AC.UK!ucleaar>
- Sender: Lojban list <cbmvax!uunet!CUVMB.BITNET!pucc.Princeton.EDU!LOJBAN>
Just to avoid confusion, it should be noted that what Lojbanists term
'clefting', mainstream linguistics terms 'raising' (i.e. a syntactic
argument of a verb in a lower clause is raised to become a
syntactic argument of a verb in a higher clause).
Clefting in English would be sentences like _It's him she loves_.
Most syntactic analyses of raising endeavour to show that the raised
item is syntactic argument of two verbs at the same time (e.g. _Sophy_
in _Sophy is believed to drink tea black_ is subject of _believed_ and
of _drink_ (& is also object of _believed_, according to some)).
As far as I am aware, this doesn't happen in Lojban (which uses
resumptive pronouns instead), but it might have been a solution
to the quandary of whether or not a placestructure should be 'cleft'.
---
And