[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bytyky.
- To: John Cowan <cowan@snark.thyrsus.com>
- Subject: bytyky.
- From: cbmvax!uunet!oasis.icl.co.uk!I.Alexander.bra0122
- Reply-To: cbmvax!uunet!oasis.icl.co.uk!I.Alexander.bra0122
- Sender: Lojban list <cbmvax!uunet!pucc.princeton.edu!LOJBAN>
bytyky. zo'u
>ni'o ca le lampru nalgundje le me bytyky. ritnacterjivna cu cfari
{ritkemnacterjvi} - or is that too fussy?
> >.i la'edi'u se jalge lenu la byrnlis. cmima ba'o le vomoi terfendi co'a le
> > cimoi terfendi gi'e pujecajeba rinka lenu mi mutce gleki
(Nick:)
> You're trying to abbreviate {ba'o cmima le vomoi gi'e co'a cmima le cimoi};
> I don't think the form you've used works, but I can suggest no better.
I think a termset does the trick (the ZAhO definitely refer
to {cmima})
la BYrnlis. cmima nu'i ba'oku le vomoi terfendi nu'u.e
co'aku le cimoi terfendi
BTW, I think you need a {kei} before the {gi'e}.
> > le kelgri poi se cmene zo su'onzis. zi'e noi natmrkymri
Nick> Is it the case that le'avla can't have {y}? If so, then natmrkmri (yum :)
I *do* hope this works :) I think you're right about {y}. I asked
Colin what was _phonologically_ wrong with his {*bradfrd.}, but
he hasn't replied yet. But the rules for _le'avla_ will be
different anyway. I suspect they unfortunately rule out both of these.
> .i lenu la byrnlis. joi la su'onzis. cu me bytyky. simjvi kei pu mentu sono
> gi'e pluka ni ki'unai lenu mi pu cilmo le carvi
{mentu li sono gi'e pluka mi}
> .i .ui la byrnlis. poroi kelsnada gi'e la su'onzis. noroi kelsnada
Another {gi'e} -> {.ije}
> .i seja'e la'edi'u la byrnlis. jinga gi'e mi mi gleki xruti lemi zdani
I quite like this "reflexive" {mi mi [] xruti}.
Iain.