[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

TECH: more about *mo'u

To: Erik Rauch <erikr@MINERVA.CIS.YALE.EDU>
Subject: TECH: more about *mo'u
From: "Mark E. Shoulson" <shoulson@CTR.COLUMBIA.EDU>
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 1993 09:29:57 -0500
In-Reply-To: jimc%MATH.UCLA.EDU@CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU's message of Tue, 16 Mar 1993 16:17:06 -0800
Reply-To: "Mark E. Shoulson" <shoulson@CTR.COLUMBIA.EDU>
Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN%CUVMB.bitnet@YaleVM.YCC.YALE.EDU>

>Date:         Tue, 16 Mar 1993 16:17:06 -0800
>From: jimc%MATH.UCLA.EDU@CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU

>He and Mark Shoulson say that termsets are the right way to go, and
>I agree.  For example:

Did I?  I don't remember saying that.  You may have me mistaken with
someone else, or maybe I'm forgetting something.

~mark

Prev by Date: Re: TECH: more about *mo'u
Next by Date: TECH: QUERY re cmene
Prev by thread: Re: TECH: more about *mo'u
Next by thread: Re: TECH: more about *mo'u
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread