[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: TECH: only, {me} place structure

To: Erik Rauch <erikr@MINERVA.CIS.YALE.EDU>
Subject: Re: TECH: only, {me} place structure
From: John Cowan <cowan@SNARK.THYRSUS.COM>
Date: Mon, 5 Apr 1993 12:52:39 -0400
In-Reply-To: <9304040209.AA29845@daily.grebyn.com> from "Logical Language Group" at Apr 3, 93 09:09:22 pm
Reply-To: John Cowan <cowan@SNARK.THYRSUS.COM>
Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN%CUVMB.bitnet@YaleVM.YCC.YALE.EDU>

la lojbab. cusku di'e

> OK.  Reading briefly over what you wrote, John.  I think that srana, or some
> other similar gismu, had an x3 place that was the relationship by which x1
> is related to x2.  I'll have to scan further, or maybe it got deleted from
> srana sometime not too long ago.

Nope.  The 8/2/88 public domain gismu list has "pertains/relevant to..."
with two places only.

--
John Cowan      cowan@snark.thyrsus.com         ...!uunet!lock60!snark!cowan
                        e'osai ko sarji la lojban.

Prev by Date: Re: TECH: only, {me} place structure
Next by Date: ADMIN: I'm gone for a week
Prev by thread: Re: TECH: only, {me} place structure
Next by thread: Re: TECH: only, {me} place structure
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread