Mail Thread Index

• Date Index

• Re: TECH: grammar updates, John Cowan
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: TECH: grammar updates, John Cowan
  • Re: TECH: grammar updates, Logical Language Group
  • Re: TECH: grammar updates, C.J.Fine
  • Re: TECH: grammar updates, C.J.Fine
  • Re: TECH: grammar updates, Logical Language Group
  • Re: TECH: grammar updates, Logical Language Group
  • Re: TECH: grammar updates, John Cowan
  • Re: TECH: grammar updates, John Cowan
  • Re: TECH: grammar updates, C.J.Fine
  • Re: TECH: grammar updates, John Cowan
  • Re: TECH: grammar updates, Nick Nicholas
  • Re: TECH: grammar updates, C.J.Fine
  • Re: TECH: grammar updates, jimc
  • Re: TECH: grammar updates, Logical Language Group
• re dictionaries, William Stuart-smith
• IRC ke'u, C.J.Fine
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: IRC ke'u, Nick Nicholas
  • Re: IRC ke'u, Logical Language Group
  • RE: IRC ke'u, I.Alexander.bra0125
  • RE: IRC ke'u, C.J.Fine
• TEXT.REV: le nolraixli nega'u le dembi, C.J.Fine
• TEXT.REV: le noraixli nega'u le dembi ge'uku xici, C.J.Fine
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: TEXT.REV: le noraixli nega'u le dembi ge'uku xici, Nick Nicholas
• TEXT.INT: la mikcetalul., A.D.M.Smith
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: TEXT.INT: la mikcetalul., Nick Nicholas
• My LOjban->Prolog thingy, Nick Nicholas
• version declaration for le lojbau, Mr Andrew Rosta
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: version declaration for le lojbau, lock60!snark!cowan
  • Re: version declaration for le lojbau, Mr Andrew Rosta
  • version declaration for le lojbau, Ivan A Derzhanski
• TECH: only, {me} place structure, John Cowan
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: TECH: only, {me} place structure, Logical Language Group
  • Re: TECH: only, {me} place structure, John Cowan
  • Re: TECH: only, {me} place structure, Logical Language Group
  • Re: TECH: only, {me} place structure, C.J.Fine
  • Re: TECH: only, {me} place structure, Logical Language Group
  • Re: TECH: only, {me} place structure, John Cowan
  • Re: TECH: only, {me} place structure, Chris Handley
  • Re: TECH: only, {me} place structure, C.J.Fine
• Further Lojban->Prolog: relative clauses (Repost), Nick Nicholas
• TECH: living things are made of ..., Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: TECH: living things are made of ..., Nick Nicholas
• TECH: only, 'me', C.J.Fine
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • TECH: only, 'me', C.J.Fine
• Re: TECH: word "only", jimc
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: TECH: word "only", John Cowan
  • Re: TECH: word "only", Mr Andrew Rosta
  • Re: TECH: word "only", Chris Handley
• TEXT.REV: Beowulf, John Cowan
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: TEXT.REV: Beowulf, C.J.Fine
• GEN: de'a mrilu, Iain Alexander
• Going away, C.J.Fine
• ADMIN: I'm gone for a week, John Cowan
• lujvo paper, fschulz
• Lojban->Prolog: conjunctions, Nick Nicholas
• Prolog continued: event abstractions in., Nick Nicholas
• Lujvo paper, part 3.1, Nick Nicholas
• lujvo paper, part 3.2., Nick Nicholas
• CAFE: cook (& busboy) sketch, Nick Nicholas
• Re: A (Lame) Joke in Loglan, John Cowan
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: A (Lame) Joke in Loglan, Nick Nicholas
  • Re: A (Lame) Joke in Loglan, John Cowan
• Lujvo paper, part 3.3, Nick Nicholas
• Lujvo Paper, part 4.1 (continuing from 3.3), Nick Nicholas
• I'm still there though silent :), VILVA
• A newbie, hedgehog
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: A newbie, Logical Language Group
• response to jimc on "only", Logical Language Group
• {do'e}, John Cowan
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: {do'e}, Logical Language Group
• addendum Re: TECH: word "only", Mr Andrew Rosta
• Re: Navaho (was: version declaration for le lojbau), C.J.Fine
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: Navaho (was: version declaration for le lojbau), Logical Language Group
  • Re: Navaho (was: version declaration for le lojbau), C.J.Fine
  • Re: Navaho (was: version declaration for le lojbau), Logical Language Group
  • Re: Navaho (was: version declaration for le lojbau), John Cowan
• TECH: Morocco, Lebanon, or Indonesia, Logical Language Group
• le'avla (was: version declaration for le lojbau), Ivan A Derzhanski
• Re: le'avla (was: Navaho), Chris Handley
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: le'avla (was: Navaho), Logical Language Group
• le'avla, fschulz
• Esperanto on sci.lang pt 4 of 4, Logical Language Group
• Esperanto on sci.lang pt 2 of 4, Logical Language Group
• sci.lang discussion of Esperanto pt 1 of 4, Logical Language Group
• Esperanto on sci.lang pt 3 of 4, Logical Language Group
• TECH: a few points on cmavo, John Cowan
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: TECH: a few points on cmavo, Nick Nicholas
  • Re: TECH: a few points on cmavo, Colin Fine
• Prolog semantic analyser, Nick Nicholas
• Logical extensions to English (!)....., The Songbringer -- Marnen to the common folk
• Oops, The Songbringer -- Marnen to the common folk
• TECH: experimental cmavo "xo'e", bob
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: TECH: experimental cmavo "xo'e", Colin Fine
  • TECH: experimental cmavo "xo'e", Mark E. Shoulson
  • Re: TECH: experimental cmavo "xo'e", John Cowan
  • TECH: experimental cmavo "xo'e", bob
  • Re: TECH: experimental cmavo "xo'e", Iain Alexander
  • TECH: experimental cmavo "xo'e", Mark E. Shoulson
  • TECH: experimental cmavo "xo'e", bob
  • Re: TECH: experimental cmavo "xo'e", hedgehog
  • Re: TECH: experimental cmavo "xo'e", hedgehog
  • Re: TECH: experimental cmavo "xo'e", Mr Andrew Rosta
  • Re: TECH: experimental cmavo "xo'e", Logical Language Group
  • Re: TECH: experimental cmavo "xo'e", Logical Language Group
  • TECH: experimental cmavo "xo'e", Mark E. Shoulson
• Lojban gathering (sorry Klingon list -Cc'd by mistake & can't cancel!), Colin Fine
• xo'e and noda, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: xo'e and noda, Logical Language Group
  • Re: xo'e and noda, Colin Fine
  • xo'e and noda, Mark E. Shoulson
• 3 Poems by Carl Sandburg, david twery
• TECH: xo'e, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: TECH: xo'e, lock60!snark!cowan
• TECH: only; scalar negation of numbers, Logical Language Group
• xo'e & proposal for new cmavo "_xe'o_", Mr Andrew Rosta
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: xo'e & proposal for new cmavo "_xe'o_", Logical Language Group
• TECH: "only and "mi'u", Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: TECH: "only and "mi'u", Colin Fine
• Re: non-specific SE, Iain Alexander