[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
TECH: experimental cmavo "xo'e"
What power! To eradicate a place means to change a meaning
accepted by a community.
.ienai
No more so than forming lujvo or, as I think somebody has already
suggested, adding a place with BAI. Even forming tanru has this
sort of creation.
This is an experimental issue: will people come to think of the place
structures of gismu as being hard and firm? I think they might. Only
wordsmiths and other eccentrics presume that words are protean.
Others expect and talk as if changes were glacial.
Another advantage of "xo'e" is that it _subtracts_ a place. The other
types of change either _add_ a place (one interpretation of what BAI
does) or create a quite new word. "xo'e" fills a gap.
Thus
zbasu fixo'e
means
x1 is made/built/assembled of/from x2, but I am denying the
existence, or at least the relevance, of any maker.
More than this, "xo'e" means that you should even think about a maker
in this predication about the world. The place does not exist.
(I can imagine future students ernestly debating what is mean by
xo'e zbasu xo'e xo'e
which is more elegantly stated as
xo'e xo'e xo'e zbasu
)
... I am still nervous of its propensity to encourage malglico...
Yes. This is a risk, but as John Cowan says, it depends on how it is
taught.
Robert J. Chassell bob@gnu.ai.mit.edu
Rattlesnake Mountain Road (413) 298-4725
Stockbridge, MA 01262-0693 USA