Re: The lujvo-making algorithm

[ucleaar <ucleaar@ucl.ac.uk>]

Erik:
> Should sa'urmi'e (sarcu minde) not be sarcyminde, for example? vi'ecpe
> (vitke cpedu) vitkycpe? You get more similarity without increasing the time
> it takes to say them (or by increasing it a tiny amount).

I agree with these preferences, but it is my understanding that these
different allmorphic variants of the lujvo are grammatically the same
word: that is, sahurmihe & sarcyminde are in free variation, & the
speaker chooses one over the other according to taste. Certainly
such a situation will stop us arguing about which we prefer.

----
And