Mail Thread Index

• Date Index

• do djica loi ckafi je'i tcati, Chris Bogart
  • Re: do djica loi ckafi je'i tcati, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: do djica loi ckafi je'i tcati, i.alexander.bra0125
  • Re: do djica loi ckafi je'i tcati, Jorge Llambias
  • Re: do djica loi ckafi je'i tcati, Gerald Koenig
  • Re: do djica loi ckafi je'i tcati, Jorge Llambias
  • do djica loi ckafi je'i tcati, Gerald Koenig
  • Re: do djica loi ckafi je'i tcati, Logical Language Group
• culture/nationality gismu, rricci
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: culture/nationality gismu, Logical Language Group
• The first Helsem Exercise, veion
• Things we did on grass, Chris Bogart
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: Things we did on grass, Logical Language Group
• My First Helsem Exercice, Veijo Vilva
• WWW Server Statistics, Veijo Vilva
• No Subject, Colin Fine
• mi xruti, Goran Topic
• Re: nuntroci, Jorge Llambias
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: nuntroci, Jorge Llambias
• Re: TECH: RE: do djica loi ckafi je'i tcati, Chris Bogart
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: TECH: RE: do djica loi ckafi je'i tcati, Randall Holmes
  • Re: TECH: RE: do djica loi ckafi je'i tcati, Jorge Llambias
  • Re: TECH: RE: do djica loi ckafi je'i tcati, Mark E. Shoulson
  • Re: TECH: RE: do djica loi ckafi je'i tcati, Jorge Llambias
  • Re: TECH: RE: do djica loi ckafi je'i tcati, Logical Language Group
  • Re: TECH: RE: do djica loi ckafi je'i tcati, Chris Handley
• 3 year summary of posters to Lojban List, Logical Language Group
• GEN: Parser Test Form on WWW Server, Veijo Vilva
• Updated gismu list, Logical Language Group
• Re: TECH: Any old thing whatsoever (was RE: do djica loi ckafi je'i tcati), Logical Language Group
• Re: TECH: Any old thing whatsoever (was RE: do djica loi ckafi je'i, Mark E. Shoulson
• needing 2 taxis, ucleaar
• unicorns, Jorge Llambias
• Re: Chief logician?, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: Chief logician?, Randall Holmes
  • Re: Chief logician?, Logical Language Group
• any? (response to Desmond), Logical Language Group
  • Re: any? (response to Desmond), Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: any? (response to Desmond), ucleaar
    • Re: any? (response to Desmond), Logical Language Group
  • Re: any? (response to Desmond), Desmond Fearnley-Sander
    • Re: any? (response to Desmond), Logical Language Group
  • Re: any? (response to Desmond), Chris Handley
  • Re: any? (response to Desmond), Desmond Fearnley-Sander
  • Re: any? (response to Desmond), Logical Language Group
• Re: Any?, Colin Fine
• Re: TECH: Any old thing whatsoever (mi nitcu lo tanxe), Chung-chieh Shan
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: TECH: Any old thing whatsoever (mi nitcu lo tanxe), Colin Fine
  • Re: TECH: Any old thing whatsoever (mi nitcu lo tanxe), Jorge Llambias
  • Re: TECH: Any old thing whatsoever (mi nitcu lo tanxe), Jorge Llambias
• Re: new Lojbanist in P.R. China, Chung-chieh Shan
• Re: your last message, Desmond Fearnley-Sander
• sumti raising reform, was Re: Chief logician?, Logical Language Group
• Re: Analogy, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: Analogy, Jorge Llambias
    • Re: Analogy, Logical Language Group
  • Re: Analogy, Logical Language Group
    • Re: Analogy, Logical Language Group
  • Re: Analogy, Logical Language Group
• Re: silence?, Logical Language Group
• Re: mi nitcu lo tanxe, Chung-chieh Shan
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: mi nitcu lo tanxe, Jorge Llambias
  • Re: mi nitcu lo tanxe, Chris Bogart
    • Re: mi nitcu lo tanxe, Logical Language Group
• Re: lojban and lojban list, jorge
• Re: TECH: "any" & quantification, ucleaar
• TECH: zo lo ce'o zo le (was: any? (response to Desmond)), i.alexander.bra0125
• coi .i mi cnino, Goran Topic
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: coi .i mi cnino, Goran Topic
  • Re: coi .i mi cnino, Jorge Llambias
  • Re: coi .i mi cnino, Goran Topic
  • Re: coi .i mi cnino, Jorge Llambias
  • Re: coi .i mi cnino, Chris Bogart
  • Re: coi .i mi cnino, Goran Topic
  • Re: coi .i mi cnino, Jorge Llambias
  • Re: coi .i mi cnino, Jorge Llambias
• sinking feeling, Philip Delaquess
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: sinking feeling, Veijo Vilva
  • Re: sinking feeling, Jorge Llambias
  • Re: sinking feeling, David Matuszek
• Re: remarks on gismu lexicology, ucleaar
• Re: general response on needing books, ucleaar
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: general response on needing books, Logical Language Group
• Re: specificity and metonymy, Robert J. Chassell
• Exporting numerical abstractors to the prenex, Veijo Vilva
  • Re: Exporting numerical abstractors to the prenex, Logical Language Group
• ANNOUNCEMENT: English-Lojban 15000+ entry dictionary draft avail on ftp, Logical Language Group
• coi doi goran, Chris Bogart
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: coi doi goran, Jorge Llambias
  • Re: coi doi goran, Chris Bogart
  • Re: coi doi goran, Goran Topic
  • Re: coi doi goran, Jorge Llambias
  • Re: coi doi goran, Chris Bogart
  • Re: coi doi goran, Chris Bogart
• Missing from ref grammar, Chris Bogart
  • Re: Missing from ref grammar, Logical Language Group
• Re: Re; And/Jorge on gismu lexicon, Chris Bogart
• TECH: query re. "specific zohe", ucleaar
  • Re: TECH: query re. "specific zohe", Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: TECH: query re. "specific zohe", Jorge Llambias
• le nu pilno (Was: coi...), Goran Topic
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • le nu pilno (Was: coi...), Goran Topic
  • Re: le nu pilno (Was: coi...), Jorge Llambias
  • Re: le nu pilno (Was: coi...), Chris Bogart
• xu do jimpe di'u, Sylvia Rutiser
• Re: coi doi goran., Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: coi doi goran., Logical Language Group
• Translation & commentary of Silvia's peace, Logical Language Group
• le nu pilno (Was: coi ...), Logical Language Group
• Re: doi xorxes. do ponse xo tanxe, Jorge Llambias
• The lujvo-making algorithm, Erik Rauch
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: The lujvo-making algorithm, Logical Language Group
  • Re: The lujvo-making algorithm, ucleaar