[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Missing from ref grammar



I haven't been able to find a thorough discussion anywhere in the reference
grammar about poi, noi, and ke'a.  The difference between poi and noi is
used as an analogy to something else (pe and ne?  I don't remember now) so
they do get mentioned, but never explicitly introduced, despite the claim
that they are "described in more detail elsewhere".

I know there are papers yet to be written, so if this is already scheduled
for coverage in one of them, then never mind.
 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 Chris Bogart
 cbogart@quetzal.com
 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~