more on "any"

[Logical Language Group <lojbab>]

pc's post  gave me another example: "viska" can have an object or an event,
as far as I know, but since senses are fallable, the thing seen is intensional.

Note that his post contains a question for you (implied) about tense, 
specifially
>This won't get us
>into any (unsolvable) problems if we have a fixed notion of where pieces
>--More--
>go.  I used to be sure that in Lojban the implicit order of "tenses" was
>modal temporal spatial negation.  Now I am not sure, nor do I remember
>what the device is for shifting them -- _ku_ maybe. In any case, it all
>takes place at prenex level and so the shifts in the heart of the sentence
>are not affected. 

lojbab