Re: jorne

[ucleaar <ucleaar@ucl.ac.uk>]

Jorge:

> > > I have trouble imagining what {dunda} means if you
> > > ziho out one of its places, for example.
> > I can't think what {dunda fe ziho} or {dunda fi ziho} wd mean, but
> > {dunda fa ziho} wd surely mean "receive". That actually seems to me
> > like a relatively reasonable use of ziho.
> Well, I don't know. In what context would {dunda fa zi'o} be better
> than {dunda fa zo'e}?  It doesn't seem to make much difference.

Can someone receive without anyone having given?

One difference between zohe and ziho is that nonspecific zohe
interacts with the quantificational scope of other sumti. This
wdn't happen with ziho.

> Then you agree that {zi'o} wouldn't be better than zo'e as default?

In general I agree. For, say, some sumti of klama I'm not sure.

---
And