Re: TECH: Negation

[DPT@HUMA1.BITNET]

I wrote:
 > I found this very odd and went and checked the negation paper.  It
 > seems to be correct.

jorge wrote:
 > I think it's not correct. Does the negation paper really say it is?
 > In any case, the De Morgan's laws part of the paper is not really
 > very trustworthy, I think.

No, it doesn't actually say {ra}; I hadn't read the DeMorgan's law
section, and was relying on the earlier portions (which might be read to
imply {ra}).

 > > Please tell me I'm misinterpreting something.
 >
 > You're misinterpreting something.

.i ki'e mu'o mi'e. dilyn.