noa regressing

[ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>]

Lojbab:
> And:
> >The current logic of {nei} and {noa} seems rather odd to me - it seems
> >to give an infinite regression of bridis that contain copies of
> >themselves.  I've probably misunderstood {nei} and {noa}, but if I
> >haven't maybe they could be reassigned.  [I guess they are intended to
> >be used with gadri, e.g.  {lo te noa}, but I don't see how that avoids
> >infinite regression.]
> la djef. jinvi ledu'u
>          la djan. cu klama le zarci le zdani fu le karce po le nei
> Jeff opines that John goes to the store from the house in his (John's)
> car.

la djef. jinvi leduu la djan. cu klama le zarci fu le karce po le nei
be la djan bei le zarci bei fu le karce po le nei be la djan bei le
zarci fu le karce po le nei be la djan bei le zarci bei fu le karce
po le nei be la djan bei le zarci fu le karce po le nei be la djan bei
le zarci bei fu le karce po le nei be la djan bei le zarci fu le karce
po le nei be la djan bei le zarci bei fu le karce po le nei be la djan
bei le zarci fu le karce po le nei be la djan bei le zarci bei fu le
karce po le nei be la djan bei le zarci fu le karce po le nei.....

---
And