[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: TECH: PROPOSED CHANGE 37: Relative Clauses before names

la lojbab cusku di'e

> There could also be some funky elidable effects:
> la noi ciska sutramau be la lojbab. djan. kau,n.  would not work without
> a be'o or ku'o, but with a brivla istead of lojbab. would be fine.

A computer would take the {su} to delete everything that came before
and then be left with {tramau be la lojbab. djan. kau,n.}.

I suppose you meant {sutrymau}. What a big difference a little typo
can make!