Re: from the paper archives - pc on abstractors and tense

> My criticism of {mue}/{puo}/{zahi}/{zuo} is only that the traditional
> system of 4 situation types has been cast in stone by privileging
> them with their own cmavo. The system is certainly useful descriptively,
> but it is underlain by a different, simpler and more revealing system
> - or so I think and so others think, even if people differ on the details
> of their preferred analysis.

Enlighten us, {doi febvi logji prenu}.  What is this underlying system?

-- 
John Cowan					cowan@ccil.org
		e'osai ko sarji la lojban.