[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: TECH: PROPOSED GRAMMAR CHANGE 38: lambda via new selma'o CEhU

la xorxes. cusku di'e

> I don't think it's overloading. In any case, what's the rush?
> If we find in practice that {ke'a} is causing confusion, a new one
> can be added, but I don't see that happening.

Trying to get the reference grammar out, that's the rush.

John Cowan					cowan@ccil.org
		e'osai ko sarji la lojban.