Re: loglan rapprochement orthography

[John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>]

la .iVAN. cusku di'e

> What, there is a Lojban Cyrillic orthography by me?  Wow.  I wonder
> what other remarkable things I've done and forgotten everything about.
> 
> But since it's mine, even though I don't remember making it, I'm going
> to make a slight alteration in it:  Let {'} be written {'} in Cyrillic
> as well as Latin.

So mote it be.

> Whatever it is phonetically, it is structurally not
> a consonant (it can't be one of the {C}s in {CVCCV}, {CCV} and all the
> other formulae), so I'd rather keep it graphically distinct from them
> as well.  (This is also an argument against {h} in Roman.)

doi .and., please take note.  This is the point we've been trying to make 
and (apparently) failing to.